Professional assessment reports often need to reach people who do not share the auditor's working language. AI security reviewers, red teams, model platform teams, application security engineers, governance specialists, students, and organizations deploying AI-enabled systems need a report they can read without losing the stable identifiers and decisions that make the assessment traceable. voiqq supports OWASP AISVS assessment report output in English, Dutch, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Polish from Pro upward.
The problem multilingual delivery must solve
Manual translation at the end of an engagement is risky. A translator can change a requirement identifier, strengthen a cautious finding, weaken a serious limitation, confuse a workflow status with validation, or turn a readiness statement into a compliance claim. Copying content into a second document also disconnects it from current assignments, evidence, remediation, and retest results. A safer workflow separates canonical project data from human-facing report language.
Understand the standard before translating the report
OWASP AISVS structures security verification for AI-enabled applications. The assessment must distinguish the model, prompts, retrieval sources, tools, agents, APIs, authorization, data handling, output use, monitoring, and operational environment. A generic model statement cannot replace system-specific evidence.
Read the official OWASP AISVS project
What seven-language reporting changes
The selected report language localizes report headings, field labels, known conformance or coverage values, workflow terms, dates, deterministic fallback text, and AI-assisted narrative where enabled. It does not change the Program, Library, version, level, requirement IDs, source findings, assignments, status, validation, evidence, or report usage meter. English remains available on every plan; Dutch, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Polish professional output starts on Pro.
A reliable workflow from project to export
Define the AI system, trust boundaries, models, data sources, tools, users, environments, target AISVS profile, and exclusions. Map reviewed findings to canonical requirements, preserve attack preconditions and evidence, assign remediation, validate controls, and generate deterministic coverage. Language output changes report presentation but never decides whether an AI control passed.
- Confirm the selected Program, Library, standard version, target level or profile, and project scope.
- Review source findings, requirement mappings, active and resolved states, validation, evidence, assignments, and remediation.
- Open the report generator and choose the intended recipient language.
- Review every editable metadata, scope, methodology, contact, and disclaimer field.
- Generate the preview and inspect deterministic conformance or coverage separately from translated prose.
- Correct project mappings before export and use report-only edits only for genuine presentation judgments.
- Download the DOCX or PDF, inspect layout and language, and preserve the approved snapshot.
Preserve evidence and professional meaning
Project names, product names, company names, URLs, code, selectors, control IDs, success criteria, requirement IDs, model names, device identifiers, quoted statements, and raw evidence require careful treatment. voiqq keeps canonical identifiers unchanged and does not silently translate user-authored evidence. When narrative evidence must be translated, use an authorized fluent reviewer and store the approved wording in the project rather than relying on a last-minute cosmetic conversion.
When AI drafting is unavailable
The report should still work. Deterministic fallbacks provide concise, professional language for supported, limited, not applicable, not evaluated, covered, partially covered, not covered, or not assessed states as appropriate to the Program. They do not paste bug IDs, selectors, classes, raw tracker descriptions, or machine-looking warnings into the client report. A reviewer can edit the draft before export.
Review responsibilities
A fluent AI security reviewer should check translated threat language, requirement references, data sensitivity, model and vendor names, evidence redaction, severity, coverage states, limitations, and remediation precision. Avoid claims that imply safety certification.
- Confirm specialist terminology with a fluent reviewer.
- Verify that every canonical identifier and version remained unchanged.
- Check that translated prose reflects the rule-determined result rather than altering it.
- Keep confidential or sensitive evidence out of external drafting unless authorized.
- Inspect page breaks, tables, fonts, links, logo, contacts, and warnings in the downloaded file.
- Do not claim certification, attestation, legal compliance, or complete coverage unless an authorized professional process supports that statement.
How voiqq supports international delivery
voiqq keeps projects, findings, comments, evidence, assignment, validation, history, imports, report snapshots, and permissions in one workspace. Program-specific report builders reuse that reviewed record while keeping their own standards and conclusions. This lets a team prepare one defensible assessment and create reviewed deliverables for different audiences without maintaining disconnected copies of the audit.
A practical next step
Choose one completed project and generate an English draft first. Resolve missing mappings and warnings. Then select the intended additional language and compare both versions with a fluent reviewer. Record terminology corrections in the project or report configuration so later exports become more consistent rather than relying on memory.
voiqq uses the stable OWASP AISVS 1.0 catalogue: 191 requirements in 12 chapters with verification levels 1, 2, and 3. AISVS requirements are assessment requirements, not prewritten findings; several findings can be connected to one requirement when the evidence warrants it.