Professional assessment reports often need to reach people who do not share the auditor's working language. Application security engineers, penetration testers, development teams, consultancies, students, and international organizations assessing web applications and APIs need a report they can read without losing the stable identifiers and decisions that make the assessment traceable. voiqq supports OWASP ASVS assessment report output in English, Dutch, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Polish from Pro upward.
The problem multilingual delivery must solve
Manual translation at the end of an engagement is risky. A translator can change a requirement identifier, strengthen a cautious finding, weaken a serious limitation, confuse a workflow status with validation, or turn a readiness statement into a compliance claim. Copying content into a second document also disconnects it from current assignments, evidence, remediation, and retest results. A safer workflow separates canonical project data from human-facing report language.
Understand the standard before translating the report
OWASP ASVS provides security verification requirements and assurance levels for web applications and APIs. Requirement identifiers and target levels remain canonical across languages. Scanner alerts alone do not establish requirement coverage, and no finding does not necessarily mean a requirement was assessed.
Read the official OWASP ASVS project
What seven-language reporting changes
The selected report language localizes report headings, field labels, known conformance or coverage values, workflow terms, dates, deterministic fallback text, and AI-assisted narrative where enabled. It does not change the Program, Library, version, level, requirement IDs, source findings, assignments, status, validation, evidence, or report usage meter. English remains available on every plan; Dutch, French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Polish professional output starts on Pro.
A reliable workflow from project to export
Define the application, environment, authorization, ASVS version, target level, and exclusions. Normalize manual, code-review, configuration, API, and approved automated observations into clear findings. Map each finding to the correct requirement, preserve technical evidence, assign remediation, validate fixes, and generate a report whose coverage states come from reviewed project data.
- Confirm the selected Program, Library, standard version, target level or profile, and project scope.
- Review source findings, requirement mappings, active and resolved states, validation, evidence, assignments, and remediation.
- Open the report generator and choose the intended recipient language.
- Review every editable metadata, scope, methodology, contact, and disclaimer field.
- Generate the preview and inspect deterministic conformance or coverage separately from translated prose.
- Correct project mappings before export and use report-only edits only for genuine presentation judgments.
- Download the DOCX or PDF, inspect layout and language, and preserve the approved snapshot.
Preserve evidence and professional meaning
Project names, product names, company names, URLs, code, selectors, control IDs, success criteria, requirement IDs, model names, device identifiers, quoted statements, and raw evidence require careful treatment. voiqq keeps canonical identifiers unchanged and does not silently translate user-authored evidence. When narrative evidence must be translated, use an authorized fluent reviewer and store the approved wording in the project rather than relying on a last-minute cosmetic conversion.
When AI drafting is unavailable
The report should still work. Deterministic fallbacks provide concise, professional language for supported, limited, not applicable, not evaluated, covered, partially covered, not covered, or not assessed states as appropriate to the Program. They do not paste bug IDs, selectors, classes, raw tracker descriptions, or machine-looking warnings into the client report. A reviewer can edit the draft before export.
Review responsibilities
A security reviewer should confirm that translated narrative preserves risk meaning, does not expose secrets, and does not exaggerate an observation. Verify requirement IDs, CWE context, affected assets, severity, coverage states, test limitations, and retest evidence.
- Confirm specialist terminology with a fluent reviewer.
- Verify that every canonical identifier and version remained unchanged.
- Check that translated prose reflects the rule-determined result rather than altering it.
- Keep confidential or sensitive evidence out of external drafting unless authorized.
- Inspect page breaks, tables, fonts, links, logo, contacts, and warnings in the downloaded file.
- Do not claim certification, attestation, legal compliance, or complete coverage unless an authorized professional process supports that statement.
How voiqq supports international delivery
voiqq keeps projects, findings, comments, evidence, assignment, validation, history, imports, report snapshots, and permissions in one workspace. Program-specific report builders reuse that reviewed record while keeping their own standards and conclusions. This lets a team prepare one defensible assessment and create reviewed deliverables for different audiences without maintaining disconnected copies of the audit.
A practical next step
Choose one completed project and generate an English draft first. Resolve missing mappings and warnings. Then select the intended additional language and compare both versions with a fluent reviewer. Record terminology corrections in the project or report configuration so later exports become more consistent rather than relying on memory.
voiqq uses the official OWASP ASVS 5.0.0 catalogue: 345 individual verification requirements across 17 chapters. A finding can be linked to the relevant requirement, while the report summarizes coverage by chapter instead of dumping every requirement into the report.